Covid-19 Covid-19 in teorije zarot

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
Važna je vsebina. Povej, če je z vsebino, ki sem jo citiral, kaj narobe oz ne drži.
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.769
2.022
113
Ni treba, da se ukvarjamo s tem ali citati držijo ali ne, ker to ni pomembno. Pomembno je, ali ima njegov članek res neko verodostojno vrednost in sicer, uspešnost ivermectina proti covidu. Glede na vse raziskave, ni uspešen. Zakaj bi to sedaj na WP objavljali, da je uspešen, mi nikakor ni jasno. Lahko bi možakar pisal o domnevni uspešnosti, ampak kolikor vidim, ni pisal o tem. Izdal je celo knjigo na to temo, lahko si jo kupiš:

Zato je prav, da je kot je.
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
Ni treba, da se ukvarjamo s tem ali citati držijo ali ne, ker to ni pomembno.

Zato je prav, da je kot je.
What is truly troubling is that the Wikipedia editor considers this type of “fact check” by a non-physician a reliable source. What is even more troubling is that Wikipedia DOES NOT CONSIDER the American Journal of Therapeutics a reliable source. Their editors REFUSED to allow even the mention of Dr. Kory's recent publication or Dr. Tess Lawrie's recent publication in the same journal.
:bonk:
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.769
2.022
113
Izkazuje se, da je njegovo mnenje napačno zato je prav, da so tako naredili. Dokazov za njegov prav, je 0.
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.147
5.569
113
Ti vsebine sploh nisi prebral niti je ne razumeš.
Si samo še eden v množici koristnih idiotov.
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.769
2.022
113
Sem vsaj koristen, ker ti še koristen nisi. In ja sem prebral in ne se ne strinjam v celoti z napisanim in ja, mislim, da ivermectin nima kaj počet v člankih na WP kot zdravilo proti covidu, ker za to ni nobenega dokaza. Tisto kar je bilo nekoč kot dokaz, je že zdavnej demantirano. Ampak nekateri še kar živite v rož'cah.
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
FA8M5c_XsAICerJ
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
Okostnjaki padajo iz omare:


  • National Institutes of Health Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak admitted in a letter Wednesday that his agency funded gain-of-function research in China.
  • Tabak said EcoHealth Alliance failed to notify the NIH that pathogens in a lab exhibited a greater than one log, or ten-times, increase in growth.
  • “EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant,” Tabak said in a letter to House Oversight and Reform Committee Ranking Member Rep. James Comer of Kentucky.
  • National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci repeatedly insisted that his agency’s research grant with EcoHealth Alliance did not involve gain-of-function research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
  • Infectious disease expert Dr. Richard Ebright said Wednesday the letter proves that the NIH and its top brass “lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public. Knowingly. Willfully. Brazenly.”
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113

While Tabak's letter goes to great lengths to insist that EcoHealth's work couldn't have produced SARS-CoV-2, it absolutely vindicates Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who Fauci repeatedly called a liar in July for accusing him of funding GoF research in Wuhan, China.
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113

Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican and vocal Fauci critic, tweeted Wednesday: "'I told you so' doesn’t even begin to cover it here."

Paul requested in July that Attorney General Merrick Garland criminally investigate Fauci over Senate testimony in which he said NIH never funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.