Vojna v Ukrajini

Status
Tema ni odprta za nadaljno razpravo.
I

Izbrisan uporabnik 474

Sedi 1.

Memorandum je sestavljen iz treh, za tri države. Pogovarjamo se o Ukrajini in ne Belorusiji. Lahko pa svojo trditev podrobneje obrazložiš.

Čakaj....KAAAAJ? Kaj pa ti to blebetaš? Memorandum je en, eden samcat in edini. Ni večih memorandumov za vsako državo posebej. Preveden je le v več jezikov, ki pa so med seboj enaki. Ne obstaja memorandum za Belorusijo, pa en za Ukrajino, pa še en za Kazahstan

Memorandum se glasi:

1.) Respect Belarusian, Kazakh and Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.
2.) Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Belarus, Kazakhstan or Ukraine.
3.) Refrain from using economic pressure on Belarus, Kazakhstan or Ukraine to influence their politics.
4.) Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Belarus, Kazakhstan or Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".
5.) Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Belarus, Kazakhstan or Ukraine.
6.) Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.
 
I

Izbrisan uporabnik 474

The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances comprises three identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary, on 5 December 1994, to provide security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).


In prosim obrazložitev tvoje kršitve

Bumbar, to ne pomeni, da so trije (identični) memorandumu, ampak da veljajo za vse tri države ista določila. Vsebino memoranduma sem ti napisal zgoraj. Ne omenja se vsake države posebej, temveč vse tri države skupaj z enakimi določili.
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: Davidoff
I

Izbrisan uporabnik 474

British Independent
The British Independent, citing an intelligence report, provides great analytics on the balance of Russian and Ukrainian forces.

▪️Ukrainian troops are 20 times inferior to Russian troops in artillery, 40 times in ammunition, and 12 times in range.

▪️The Ukrainian side has almost completely run out of missiles for the Smerch and Uragan MLRS.

▪️Ukraine still has the Grad MLRS and howitzers that hit a maximum of 20-30 km.

▪️ Anti-tank Javelins and NLAW were very useful in the first phase of the war, they are useful now, but they cannot hit the enemy's long-range artillery.

▪️The Russians can hit the concentrations of Ukrainian troops with rockets from a distance of many tens and even hundreds of kilometers. There is a situation of "absolute inequality on the battlefield, not to mention the complete dominance of enemy aircraft in the air." It is rare to shoot down Russian planes and helicopters.

▪️"Heavy fighting" has a serious demoralizing effect on Ukrainian troops, in connection with which the number of cases of desertion among Ukrainian soldiers is growing.

▪️The Russians are well aware that the number of powerful weapons sent by Western countries is still quite small, and it reaches the front slowly. So they try to use their (overwhelming) advantage while it lasts.

▪️After a series of exchanges, Ukraine has 550 captured Russians, while the Russians have more than 5,600 Ukrainians, and Moscow demands a 1:1 exchange. Note that according to the authorities of Russia and the LDNR, more than 7,000 people are in captivity.

Guardian
The Ukrainian army has almost used up all its artillery ammunition - The Guardian

This was stated to the British edition by the deputy head of the GUR of Ukraine Vadym Skibitsky. He noted that the Armed Forces of Ukraine use from 5,000 to 6,000 shells a day, but they lose a lot in an artillery war. Therefore, it is necessary that the West increase supplies, Skibitsky added.

“Now this is an artillery war and we are losing in terms of artillery. Now everything depends on what (the West) gives us. Ukraine has one artillery piece for every 10-15 Russian artillery pieces. Our Western partners have given us about 10% of what they have.”
 

darjan

Vulkanizer
13. sep 2007
54.044
7.183
113
Ukrainian Culture and Information Policy Minister Oleksandr Tkachenko has announced the establishment of an expert council on "de-communisation and de-Russification".
 
I

Izbrisan uporabnik 474

Ukrajinci ne morejo prodati žita...če jim ga pa rusi vsega pokradejo

A ni UN par dni nazaj podal izjavo, da ne obstajaj nobeni oprijemljivi dokazi, da bi naj Rusija "kradla" žito? Pa kako "newly occupied city," če pa so Ukrajinci izvedli strašno ofenzivo in potisnili Ruse do Baltika?

Drugače pa Ukrajina ne more prodati žit p pomorskih poteh, ker so si Odesso tako zminirali, da še s kanujem ni varno okoli veslat. V "manjših" količinah Ukrajina še vedno izvaža po cesti in železnici...
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: AndY1

corsol

Guru
11. mar 2010
3.367
1.212
113
British Independent


Guardian

....ampak tudi na drugi strani folk zbira denar za osnovno opremo za vojake(manjši droni, nočni vid , hrana,. ) in to v situaciji ko sploh še ni mobilizacije (RUS) .
Rusija ima kao velike dobičke na račun energentov....že mogoče, sam navadni vojaki bodo imeli zgleda bolj malo od tega.
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
5.571
2.567
113
Za crknt, lol :D

Agenti ruske zvezne zaščitne službe (FSB), ki spremljajo Vladimirja Putina v tujini, poberejo njegov urin in iztrebke ter jih dostavijo v Moskvo, poroča Paris Match.

 
Status
Tema ni odprta za nadaljno razpravo.