EDIT2 25/11/21: Here is the poster.
The entirety of the results is
two screenshots of PULS readouts, supposedly showing change before and after vaccination in two patients (with after reports taken at the exact same time...?). This is completely farcical. The AHA have serious questions to answer about how this was accepted for presentation.
The AHA have now issued an Expression of Concern for this abstract.
1) It's a non-peer-reviewed conference abstract.
2) It's a single author. That's weird, and rare, considering a single person
certainly didn't do all the work this abstract describes themselves
3) The single author is
Steven Gundry, a "functional" medicine quack renowned for promoting lectin-avoidance diets as cure-alls.
4) It's absolutely impossible to ascertain the methods here.
5) Because the abstract is terribly written, it's almost impossible to work out what they're actually trying to report
6) I'm not a cardiologist, but from what I can tell and my general impression the PULS test is not a validated biomarker.
The website gives no publications. The papers referenced in the FAQ are small and terribly cited. The test is
marketed by numerous natural health websites.
Edit: one of the only academic results for the PULS test is
this 2019 abstract, also by Grundy, that shows that lectin-free diets dramatically reduce PULS scores! Who would have predicted that! (obviously this work was never published, because it probably never existed)
7) The conclusions: "
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination" are over-reaching nonsense.
8) Given what we know about vaccine responses, I'd be more inclined to just think this abstract is bollocks, rather than even any normal physiological inflammatory response
[\quote]