Covid-19 Covid-19 in teorije zarot

Military Documents about Gain of Function contradict Fauci testimony under oath​

Hint: DARPA je bila proti Gain-Of-Function raziskavam, ker so bile preveč rizične. Fauci je kljub temu šel v gain-of-function raziskave preko EcoHealth Alliance-a.

Trusted News Initiative = FACT CHECKERS

Reuters je en glavnih 'fact checkerjev'.

Analiza Dr. Malone-a Veritasovih dokumentov. Na 1.30 pojasni, kako naj bi prislo do leak-a, glede na podatke iz dokumentov:

Emails to Dr Anthony Fauci show ‘likely’ explanation identified at start of coronavirus pandemic, but there were worries about saying so

Leading British and US scientists thought it was likely that Covid accidentally leaked from a laboratory but were concerned that further debate would harm science in China, emails show.

An email from Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, on February 2 2020 said that “a likely explanation” was that Covid had rapidly evolved from a Sars-like virus inside human tissue in a low-security lab.

The email, to Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins of the US National Institutes of Health, went on to say that such evolution may have “accidentally created a virus primed for rapid transmission between humans”.

But a leading scientist told Sir Jeremy that “further debate would do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular”. Dr Collins, the former director of the US National Institutes of Health, warned it could damage “international harmony”.

Viscount Ridley, co-author of Viral: the search for the origin of Covid, said: “These emails show a lamentable lack of openness and transparency among Western scientists who appear to have been more interested in shutting down a hypothesis they thought was very plausible, for political reasons.”

In the emails, Sir Jeremy said that other scientists also believed the virus could not have evolved naturally. One such scientist was Professor Mike Farzan, of Scripps Research, the expert who discovered how the original Sars virus binds to human cells.

Scientists were particularly concerned by a part of Covid-19 called the furin cleavage site, a section of the spike protein which helps it enter cells and makes it so infectious to humans.

Summarising Professor Farzan’s concerns in an email, Sir Jeremy said: “He is bothered by the furin site and has a hard time (to) explain that as an event outside the lab, though there are possible ways in nature but highly unlikely.

“I think this becomes a question of how do you put all this together, whether you believe in this series of coincidences, what you know of the lab in Wuhan, how much could be in nature - accidental release or natural event? I am 70:30 or 60:40.”

Later emails showed that by February 4, Sir Jeremy had revised his estimate of a laboratory leak to 50:50, while Professor Eddie Holmes, of the University of Sydney, gave a 60:40 estimate in favour of an accidental release.

The emails also show that Bob Garry, of the University of Texas, was unconvinced that Covid-19 emerged naturally.

“I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature,” he said.

Professor Andrew Rambaut, from the University of Edinburgh, also said that furin cleavage site “strikes me as unusual”.

He added: “I think the only people with sufficient information or access to samples to address it would be the teams working in Wuhan.”

The new details came to light after members of the US Republican House Oversight Committee were granted access to the documents, after complaining that their content had been heavily redacted when released under Freedom of Information requests.

The Washington Times, others, have been cast from public debate

Last month, Dr. Robert Malone, an American virologist and immunologist who worked on developing the mRNA technology used in COVID-19 vaccinations, suggested to podcaster Joe Rogan that we are living through an era of mass formation psychosis.

“There was a European intellectual inquiry into what the heck happened in Germany in the ’20s and ’30s,” Dr. Malone explained. “Very intelligent, highly educated population and they went barking mad. How did that happen?”


He continued: “The answer is mass formation psychosis. When you have a society that has become decoupled from each other and has free-floating anxiety and a sense that things don’t make sense … and then their attention gets focused by a leader or series of events on one small point, just like hypnosis … they can be led anywhere.”

“The people they identify as their leaders,” he added, “the ones that typically come in and say, ‘You have this pain, and I and I alone can solve it for you’ — they will follow that person. It doesn’t matter whether they lie to them. … The data is irrelevant.”

“Furthermore, anybody who questions that narrative is to be immediately attacked. They are ‘the other,’” Dr. Malone said. “And this is what has happened. We’ve had all of those conditions.”


Shortly after the Dec. 31 interview, “mass formation psychosis” began trending in online searches. Google searches on this day suggested the company was scrambling to censor the content, and manually altering its algorithm to find no search results.

“It looks as if these results are changing quickly,” a Google message on Jan. 1 said in response to a search for the term. “If this topic is new, it can sometimes take time for results to be added by reliable sources.”

Last week, YouTube took down the video of the Rogan-Malone interview. Over the weekend, the trusty “fact-checkers” at Reuters and The Associated Press droned in unison that there is no evidence of pandemic mass formation psychosis.

Now, when you Google the term, only the “fact-checks” denouncing Dr. Malone’s theory appear online — ironically, proving Dr. Malone may have a point: Go against the prevailing narrative, and you will be chastised and removed from the public debate.

We live in a twisted age, where Big Tech and the media, instead of questioning the Biden administration on behalf of the people, are now using their megaphones to blast out the administration’s talking points.

Call it the Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, like the one used by National Socialist Germany to control the content of the press, literature, film, music, theater, television and radio.

The Washington Times opinion pages have been called out several times by these so-called “fact-checkers” and have been put on notice by Big Tech.

Just last week, Michael McKenna’s column questioning why we call these COVID-19 shots vaccines — when they don’t prevent the spread or contraction of the virus — got fact-checked “false” by “independent” fact-checkers used by Facebook.

Facebook said the piece lacked “context: Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people,” citing a fact-check that simply said: “The vaccines are vaccines … using needles or sprays to trigger immune responses that protect us against viruses when they show up is vaccination, and that’s what the three U.S.-approved shots do.”

The “fact-check” ignored the rapid spread of the omicron variant among vaccinated and boosted individuals, the waning efficacy of all three approved vaccinations, and the fact the CDC changed the “definition” of a vaccine in May to focus on the stimulation of an immune response rather than immunity. The gatekeepers simply parroted the government’s line.

As The Wall Street Journal explained in its opinion pages this week: “As of Jan. 1, omicron represented more than 95% of U.S. Covid cases. … Because some of omicron’s 50 mutations are known to evade antibody protection, because more than 30 of those mutations are to the spike protein used as an immunogen by the existing vaccines, and because there have been mass omicron outbreaks in heavily vaccinated populations, scientists are highly uncertain the existing vaccines can stop it from spreading. As the CDC put it on Dec. 20, ‘We don’t yet know … how well available vaccines and medications work against it.’”

Last year, the CDC admitted COVID-19 vaccines no longer prevent transmission, and last week Moderna’s CEO said people may need a fourth COVID-19 shot as the efficacy of boosters is likely to decline over time.

The Washington Times challenged the “fact-check” with, you know, facts. We don’t anticipate any response, revision or apology from the mainstream media or Big Tech. As a matter of fact, we expect this article will be flagged as well.

Other columns we have run on these pages, citing the benefits of natural immunity and questioning if COVID-19 originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, the benefit of vaccinating small children and the wisdom of a universal vaccination strategy, have all come under similar scrutiny — from the same folks.

We view it as our job to question authority. To listen and give fair representation to all voices on any issue. To give an opinion and for it to be heard or challenged.

The more voices there are in any debate, the better. This is our philosophy, and we’re not backing down.

Raje poslusaj kaj Malone pove.

Res ne zmores napisati nic koristnega?