Vojna v Ukrajini 2

B81

22. jul 2007
34.514
8.959
113
"Destroying the country's energy system is a legitimate military necessity" NATO press secretary Jamie Shea said in 1999 during the attacks on Yugoslavia.

"And if at the same time the civilian population suffers, then this is solely the fault of the country's leadership." Washington Post


Ko bodo na vrsti 750 kV sistemi distribucije, potem bo game over z elektro sistemom.



o opravičevanju vojaške "intervencije"
The justification given for the invasion of Yugoslavia aka Serbia, was a massacre of 2.000 Kosovars allegedly by Serb forces, an event which came in handy for employing the new NATO ‘right to invade’ doctrine promoted by leftist neoliberal media The Guardian, “humanitarian intervention”. Just two things, first, the massacre happened AFTER the invasion and bombing had already taken place. Two. What constitutes a massacre? Apparently, the slaughter of 70.000 Kurds by NATO member Turkey happening at the same time, was not deemed worthy of being called a massacre warranting “humanitarian intervention”. In fact it barely made the inside pages of our trusty newspapers. The Kosovars were trained and funded by the British. A mere anecdote to be sure.


btw, od oktobra IDF teroristi in settlerji okupatorji tolčejo Palestince po Gazi in Zahodnem bregu (kjer ni Hamasa).
Kdaj bo Nato ponovil intervencijo ?
Ti si pa z marsa priletel pred kratkim, ne?

Poznaš razlog, zakaj je nato klatil po jugoslaviji?
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: visek_izobrazbe

msenjur

Guru
11. sep 2007
25.600
253
113
"Destroying the country's energy system is a legitimate military necessity" NATO press secretary Jamie Shea said in 1999 during the attacks on Yugoslavia.

"And if at the same time the civilian population suffers, then this is solely the fault of the country's leadership." Washington Post


Ko bodo na vrsti 750 kV sistemi distribucije, potem bo game over z elektro sistemom.



o opravičevanju vojaške "intervencije"
The justification given for the invasion of Yugoslavia aka Serbia, was a massacre of 2.000 Kosovars allegedly by Serb forces, an event which came in handy for employing the new NATO ‘right to invade’ doctrine promoted by leftist neoliberal media The Guardian, “humanitarian intervention”. Just two things, first, the massacre happened AFTER the invasion and bombing had already taken place. Two. What constitutes a massacre? Apparently, the slaughter of 70.000 Kurds by NATO member Turkey happening at the same time, was not deemed worthy of being called a massacre warranting “humanitarian intervention”. In fact it barely made the inside pages of our trusty newspapers. The Kosovars were trained and funded by the British. A mere anecdote to be sure.


btw, od oktobra IDF teroristi in settlerji okupatorji tolčejo Palestince po Gazi in Zahodnem bregu (kjer ni Hamasa).
Kdaj bo Nato ponovil intervencijo ?

tam nikoli. tokrat pobijajo in umirajo tapravi.

zdele se spet lepo kaze vsa dvolicnost zahoda in NATA.
 

Kamele0N

YUGOslovanski mehanik Dmitri Mendeleev
23. jul 2008
40.907
5.460
113
In to se dogaja na njihovi zemlji...katero so jim okupirali tujci...
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: zoom

mirsi

Predator
4. jun 2014
7.784
-256
113
"Čas je, da v Ukrajino pošljemo enote Nata": Kijev ne bo padel zaradi pomanjkanja orožja, ampak zaradi pomanjkanja vojakov - pomagati mu moramo z Evropejci, pravi svetovalec ameriškega zunanjega ministrstva Edward Luttwak.
Saj če se v Ukrajini brani Europa, je pravilno da jo branijo evropejci, a ni tako?
Najprej z vojsko, če jo je premalo pa še z mobiliziranci. A imam prav?
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.836
2.089
113
Saj če se v Ukrajini brani Europa, je pravilno da jo branijo evropejci, a ni tako?
Najprej z vojsko, če jo je premalo pa še z mobiliziranci. A imam prav?

Imaš narobe. NATO ne mobilizira. Odločitev pa je vsake države posebej, ali bo svojo redno vojsko pošiljala v Ukrajino. Tudi v tem primeru ne bo mobilizacije. EU vseeno ni kot banana republika rusija.
 

B81

22. jul 2007
34.514
8.959
113
Vse drzave bi se morale drzati nacela, da ce vojska ne zmore, se pac prizna poraz.
Sicer bi potem drzave izginjale, ampak ljudje bi preziveli (pac kaj je bolje...?)
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.836
2.089
113
Vse drzave bi se morale drzati nacela, da ce vojska ne zmore, se pac prizna poraz.
Sicer bi potem drzave izginjale, ampak ljudje bi preziveli (pac kaj je bolje...?)

Dvorezen meč. Kaj je bolje, živeti kot tujec pod drugo državo, čeprav nočeš?

Vedno nekaj % ljudi odstopa in potem naredijo lahko "štalo". Imaš zdaj primer putina, kima ipd.. Taki pač poraza ne bodo nikoli ne prenesli ne priznali in bodo šli do konca, do zadnjega mrtvega sodržavljana zato da si pumpajo svoj ego in željo po še večji oblasti in teritoriju.
 

sajkek

Guru
16. mar 2008
33.409
9.158
113
vsi penzionisti,
potem nasprotniki režima, in tako dalje. na koncu pa ženske in otroci.