Tesla MODEL S

[Hoci]

 

[AndY1]

Zanimivo, ampak mislim, da je AP1 namenjen le vožnji po AC. Tole je sicer AP2, s katerim, kolikor sem seznanjen, se imajo probleme, ampak ne vem, ce je ze namenjen za vožnjo po naselju.
Bi bil pa hudicevo jezen/razocaran, da kupis avto z AP2 hardwareom in da je sistem neuporaben.
Nekako tako, kot so lastniki vsaj eno leto cakali na splavitev originalnega AP1.

 

[mr_]

Zanimivo bi bilo, da prevozi veckrat isto pot in bi opazovali razlike, kdaj se AP nauci biti boljsi.

 

[matejm1994]

Mislim da sem zasledil spodaj nekje v komentarjih, da je rekel da je to pot prevozil najmanj 30x

 

[Tenforest]

 

[sajkek]

tip kup problemov z avtom, celedneve zajebal itd, potem pa na koncu da komaj čaka,d a bo kupil novo teslo. Religija.

 

[Hoci]

Zanimivo da take novice nikoli ne "pridejo" v širše medije, kjer je povsod sama hvala na račun Tesle...
http://jalopnik.com/dont-use-teslas-autopilot-like-this-1792896205

https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/5welnn/my_car_hit_a_barrier_while_i_was_on_autopilot/

 

[Floki]

Where not to use Autopilot
There is no lower speed limit, but Autopilot is designed for highway use, so never use it on other roads. Tesla makes this clear and advises that the Autopilot system should not be used on secondary roads, meaning anything with intersections, traffic lights, or unmarked or inconsistently marked lanes.

The system is also best suited for wider highways with four or more lanes. Two-lane roads, even clearly marked ones, make it too easy for the car to veer off slightly into oncoming traffic, which requires quick driver reflexes to compensate. Furthermore, there are often stationary obstructions, such as double-parked trucks, on secondary roads. And Tesla specifically warns that such objects may not be detected by the Traffic-Aware Cruise Control and could cause an accident.

 

[naliM]

Ni pogojev, da bi vožnjo prepustil avtomobilu in se v miru predal nekemu tretjemu opravilu.
Ko gledam te video posnetke, je več kot očitno, da je precejšnji del Teslinih vernikov rojen za vožnjo z javnim prevozom.

 

[creep]

Citat:
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration into the fatal 2016 crash involving a Tesla driver found the crash rate for Tesla vehicles dropped nearly 40 percent after Autosteer was installed

Resno? Se človek vpraša o voznih sposobnostih lastnikov, da jim mora autosteer reševati situacije na cesti.

 

[Ginginova]

Homo sapiens sapiens je na splošno pač slab šofer. Popolna robotizacija vožnje vozil, bo verjetno znižala število nesreč za 99%.

 

[bpfc]

Repairing My Tesla Model S Has Been an Utter Nightmare:

https://www.fool.com/investing...aspx?yptr=yahoo

 

[AndY1]

Jp, nic novega pri Tesli.

 

[SJTV1]

Zgleda, da se bodo problema resno lotili ...
http://insideevs.com/tesla-app...ops-added-soon/

 

[mtl]

 

[AndY1]

Tesla Model S Misses Top Safety Pick+ In Latest Crash Test:
http://insideevs.com/tesla-model-s-iihs-tsp/

Citat:
The Tesla Model S has come under some scrutiny lately from the IIHS for its crash test results. In February, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said the electric vehicle only scored an “acceptable” rating because the seat belt let the dummy move too much in the small overlap test. Despite changes, when IIHS re-tested the Model S recently, the same problem happened, and so the “acceptable” rating remains on that front.

IIHS crashed two Model S vehicles and scored how they protected the battery pack. In two words: not great. In more words (from the IIHS release):

 

[SJTV1]

In seveda so jokice Tesline takoj začele pljuvat čez crash test. In če si npr ZDA ai EU izmislijo predpise za zaščito beterij, ki so na višjem nivoju kot Tesline nezaščitene, bi ziher spet jokali in vpili, da so disruptorji ki se jim godi krivica.
Kolikor jih cenim, da so avtomobilsko industrijo prinili v EV, pa ne bi čisto nič jokal, če crknejo. So že prav nadležni.

PS: in ob vsem hvaljenju z avtopilotom so še pri AEB testu mimo padli.

 

[mtl]

Tole pa ne vem, če bo dobro za prodajo Tesle 3.
Čeprav, dolgo časa je trajalo, da so se začele javno diskutirati težave Tesel. Ki jih ni tako malo.
In očitno znanje in ''okorelost'' ter konzervativnost avtomobilskih mastodontov ni čisto brez razloga.
Je.. ga, pri avtomobilu pač ne gre enostavno stisnit Control-End-Delete in restartat zadeve brez posledic.

 

[AndY1]

IIHS: Tesla Model S Has More Insurance Claims, More Costly To Fix Than Other Large Luxury Cars
http://insideevs.com/iihs-tesl...ge-luxury-cars/

 

[AndY1]

Tesla snubs J.D. Power for Initial Quality Study data
http://www.autonews.com/article/20170621/OEM05/170629941/jd-power-iqs-tesla?X-IgnoreUserAgent=1

Citat:
DETROIT -- How do the quality ratings for the 2017 Tesla Model S and Model X compare to competitors?

They don't, based off J.D. Power's 2017 U.S. Initial Quality Study that was released Wednesday. That's not because Tesla Inc. doesn't make quality vehicles, but because it doesn't allow J.D. Power access to its customer registration data for the survey.

"I don't know that they're hiding anything. They just don't want to participate," Dave Sargent, vice president, global automotive at J.D. Power, said when releasing the annual survey results here at an Automotive Press Association meeting. "It's not like their cars are falling apart."

For the annual study -- which started 30 years ago -- J.D. Power collects customer registration data from each state. It uses that information to send surveys to consumers who have leased or purchased a new vehicle for that given model year to report any problems they may have experienced in the first 90 days of ownership.

But some states, including Tesla's home of California, require automakers to grant state officials permission to release the data.

All automakers aside from Tesla have granted such access, according to Sargent. J.D. Power, he said, receives about 30 percent of Tesla's customer data. That amount is not enough for the company to place the automaker in its Initial Quality Study, which is viewed as an industry benchmark for quality